Jump to content

User:Rmhermen

This user has administrator privileges on the English Wikipedia.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Please leave messages on my talk page Thanks.
This editor is a Looshpah Laureate of the Encyclopedia and is entitled to display this Book of All Knowledge with Secret Appendix, Errata Sheet, and Author's Signature.
This user has been editing Wikipedia for more than ten years.

Admin

[edit]

I am a Wikipedia:administrator since July 5, 2004. I first contributed to Wikipedia in April of 2001 (oldest edits lost in early software upgrades). My first edit with my username appears to be on April 26. I have been active on a number of online projects - active and passive (SETI@Home, Distributed Proofreaders, Mars crater labeling, Stardust@Home, Folding@Home on the Wikipedia team: Team page, etc.)


Admin statistics
Action Count
Edits 61559
Edits+Deleted 64926
Pages deleted 3958
Revisions deleted 14
Pages restored 30
Pages protected 80
Pages unprotected 9
Protections modified 23
Users blocked 101
Users reblocked 1
User rights modified 1

User:Xenocidic/dashboard/users User:Xenocidic/dashboard/users

Immediate requests Entries
Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages 0
Wikipedians looking for help 0
Requests for unblock 84
Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests 99
Wikipedia extended-confirmed-protected edit requests 74
Wikipedia template-protected edit requests 8
Wikipedia fully protected edit requests 3
Wikipedia conflict of interest edit requests 193
Requested RD1 redactions 0
Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations 5
Candidates for speedy deletion 24
Open sockpuppet investigations 46
Click here to locate other admin backlogs

Purge the cache of this page

Administrative backlog

[edit]
All Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons
Copy to Wikimedia Commons with hidden file revisions
Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old needing human review
Requests for unblock
SPI cases awaiting administration
Wikipedia pages tagged for copyright problems
Template:Admin dashboard
Template:Admin dashboard/light
Template:Admin dashboard/light/sandbox
Template:Admin dashboard/uaarfpp
Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism
Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism/TB2
Wikipedia:Closure requests
Wikipedia:Copyright problems
Template:Did you know/Queue
Template:DYK queue/backlog
Wikipedia:Files for discussion
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion no drafts
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion no portals
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion no user pages
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion
Wikipedia:Requested moves
Wikipedia:Requests for page protection
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Autopatrolled
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Extended confirmed
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/New page reviewer
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Pending changes reviewer
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback
Wikipedia:Templates for discussion
Wikipedia:Usernames for administrator attention/Bot
Wikipedia:WikiProject History Merge

WP:AIV

Reports

[edit]

Bot-reported

[edit]

User-reported

[edit]

CSD / PRODs

[edit]
Candidates for speedy deletion Entries
Attack pages 0
Copyright violations 5
Hoaxes 0
Vandalism 0
User requested 3
Empty articles 0
Nonsense pages 0
Spam pages 4
Importance or significance not asserted 0
Possibly contested candidates 1
Other candidates 13
The following articles and files have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
Deletion backlog

This box:
Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently
Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 4 items

Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old needing human review – 13 items

Requested RD1 redactions – No backlog currently

Proposed deletion – No backlog currently

WP:UAA / WP:RFPP

[edit]
Usernames for administrator attention


Bot-reported

[edit]

User-reported

[edit]
Requests for page protection


Current requests for increase in protection level

[edit]
Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
Shortcuts

Place requests for protection increases at the BOTTOM of this section. If you cannot find your request, check the archive of requests or, failing that, the page history. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


Moshe Feiglin

[edit]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – ARBPIA. PlotinusEnjoyer (talk) 22:59, 30 April 2025 (UTC)

Huda Fakhreddine

[edit]

Reason: Many recent edits by non-ec users to content related to IP conflict area. DMH223344 (talk) 23:25, 30 April 2025 (UTC)

Netzah Yehuda Battalion

[edit]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – ARBPIA. PlotinusEnjoyer (talk) 23:51, 30 April 2025 (UTC)

Visa requirements for Chinese citizens

[edit]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. 120.22.58.136 (talk) 00:08, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

  • Automated comment: @120.22.58.136: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:19, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

Lilo & Stitch (2025 film)

[edit]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Lots of unexplained and disputed changes to the film's listed genres mainly by IP editors in the past several days. –WPA (talk) 00:20, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:34, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

Template:Article templates/generic article

[edit]

Indefinite semi-protection: Requesting semi move and edit protection as I've seen multiple cases where new users will edit this page to create their article. One case even required an admin to do a histmerge (hence the request for move protection as well). ~ Rusty meow ~ 01:21, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

Prithvi

[edit]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing by new users. Johnj1995 (talk) 02:58, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

Freaky Tales (film)

[edit]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous unsourced and non-NPOV additions from multiple IPs and accounts over the last few days. Iiii I I I (talk) 05:06, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

Miss Universe Philippines 2025

[edit]

Reason: High level of vandalism, not only with IPs but also with users with accounts. Allyriana000 (talk) 06:07, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

Mulukhiyah

[edit]

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Persistent violation of WP:ARBECR. Skitash (talk) 08:18, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

Full contact karate

[edit]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent sock puppetry by a single user trying to self-promote. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 11:56, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

Sara James

[edit]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism, including insertion of POV commentary. ZimZalaBim talk 12:31, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

Operation Barbarossa

[edit]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – edit-warring IP, adding unsourced text in part claiming to be in reffed source (which its not). IP does not stop despite my complaints. Denniss (talk) 12:47, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

Survivor: China

[edit]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by longtime sockpuppet vandal. Bgsu98 (Talk) 13:18, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

Cambodian–Vietnamese War

[edit]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Months of LTA block evasion via dynamic IPs. — MarkH21talk 13:27, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

Buffalo Public Schools

[edit]

Reason: Vandalism due to ongoing scandal RowanJ LP (talk) 13:33, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

Gabby's Dollhouse: The Movie

[edit]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Mike Allen 14:25, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

Retro (film)

[edit]

Reason: Newly released Indian film, over 150 edits since 02:51 this morning - mostly IPs edit-warring over reception and financial figures, without any sources. - Arjayay (talk) 17:34, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

Vinland

[edit]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Not sure what to do here. Moxy🍁 22:24, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) Edit war, I recommend;
Temporary semi-protection: Valorrr (lets chat) 22:27, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

Henley College Coventry

[edit]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. RCSCott91 (talk) 02:50, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

Nefesh B'Nefesh

[edit]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – ARBPIA. PlotinusEnjoyer (talk) 02:53, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

Avengers: Doomsday

[edit]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent addition of unsourced material from even autoconfirmed accounts. ECP seems necessary at this point. Trailblazer101 (talk) 03:15, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

Sinners (2025 film)

[edit]

Temporary extended confirmed protection Article was protected for four days by Chetsford due to genre warring, edit warring, and general disruptive editing by IP editors, newly registered editors, and existing accounts that are rarely used. During that time, Chetsford acknowledged that another protection block would probably be needed after the four days and it absoulutely does as all of the previous behavior continues. NJZombie (talk) 04:14, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

(G)I-dle

[edit]

Reason: The group appear to have changed name and a move discussion is in place regarding logistics and confirmation. In the meantime there are IPs changing things in the page despite hidden notes advising not to. Requesting one week protection while the move discussion is happening. orangesclub 🍊 04:20, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

Support this as various IPs are also changing the name in the RM notice template causing RMCD bot to misunderstood it as an valid action. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 11:05, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

Killing of Brian Thompson

[edit]

Reason: random ip and new user vandalism recently, idk why. maybe semi for a few weeks. Bluethricecreamman (talk) 04:42, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

List of current boxing rankings

[edit]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Blocked IP keeps jumping to other IPs to keep adding his 'expert opinion'. Nswix (talk) 06:28, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

List of current women's boxing rankings

[edit]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Blocked IP keeps jumping to other IPs to keep adding his 'expert opinion'. Nswix (talk) 06:28, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

HIT: The Third Case

[edit]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Tonyy Starkk (talk) 06:34, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

Christina Milian

[edit]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Checking the pague history of Christina Milian (album), this is long-term and a sockpuppet seems to be involved. (CC) Tbhotch™ 09:55, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

Christina Milian (album)

[edit]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Checking the pague history of Christina Milian (album), this is long-term and a sockpuppet seems to be involved. (CC) Tbhotch™ 09:55, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

It's About Time (Christina Milian album)

[edit]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Checking the pague history of Christina Milian (album), this is long-term and a sockpuppet seems to be involved. (CC) Tbhotch™ 09:55, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

Nutsa Buzaladze

[edit]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – chronic removal of sourced content by several IPs and brand new accounts over the last few days. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 10:07, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

Igor (album)

[edit]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Most of the recent edits (March-April) is vandalism by ip accounts and new accounts. —LastJabberwocky (talk) 10:43, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

The Chi

[edit]

Reason: Persistent WP:DE from IPs.The article has had consistent disruptive editing from IPs for at least a year. It was protected in May 2024 for the same reason. An IP will continually add the same content over and over, all of it being violations of WP:V and against all guidelines at MOS:TV, will get reverted by multiple different editors, but will keep adding it over and over. These IPs have been a problem to several TV-related articles for years. They do not use edit summaries or respond to any talk page warnings. I've been monitoring this for several years, and dozens and dozens of IPs have been blocked from this. The only course of action is semi-protection to the article. The articles Zatima and Power Book IV: Force have also been targets of these edits and their semi-protection completely solved all the persistent disruptive editing. Please protect these articles for a long time. Thank you. Drovethrughosts (talk) 12:07, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

Power Book III: Raising Kanan

[edit]

Reason: Please see my reason for The Chi, as it is the exact same here. This is another target that the IP(s) edit. Drovethrughosts (talk) 12:08, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

BMF (TV series)

[edit]

Reason: Please see my reason for The Chi, as it is the exact same here. This is another target that the IP(s) edit Drovethrughosts (talk) 12:09, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

Aries (astrology)

[edit]

Reason: Four edits to change dates in a way that contradicts cited sources since 6 April, all from different IP addresses in different locations. Jc3s5h (talk) 14:08, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

Gaza Freedom Flotilla Incident

[edit]

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Per WP:ARBPIA. Sophisticatedevening🍷(talk) 14:40, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

Kazi Nazrul Islam

[edit]

Full protection: Edit warring. CharlesWain (talk) 14:48, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 15:26, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

Trumpet of Patriots

[edit]

Reason: Vandalism and lots of unsourced claims from IPs on the eve of an election. StAnselm (talk) 15:05, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

Kurdistan Region–PKK conflict

[edit]

Reason: Edit war 111.125.227.18 (talk) 15:49, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

  • Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked from editing Wikipedia.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:22, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

Cowboy Carter Tour

[edit]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent, ongoing vandalism by anonymous editors of a highly publicized current music event. livelikemusic (TALK!) 16:00, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

Muhoozi Kainerugaba

[edit]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – (Persistent disruptive editing). ⋆⁺ ཐི Wakabenga ཋྀ ⁺⋆ 16:06, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

Yoweri Museveni

[edit]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing ⋆⁺ ཐི Wakabenga ཋྀ ⁺⋆ 16:07, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

Shamoun Hanne Haydo

[edit]

Reason: High level of contentious editing surrounding a naming dispute between Assyrian and Aramean (present for many years) Surayeproject3 (talk) 16:41, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Polansky

[edit]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 16:57, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

Judy Cornwell

[edit]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky (talk) 17:09, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

Michael Polansky

[edit]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. --Another Believer (Talk) 17:09, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

Talk:Michael Polansky

[edit]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – LTA disruptively editing multiple AfDs. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 17:11, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

Sugababes '25 Tour

[edit]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent change in sourced content by anonymous editor(s). livelikemusic (TALK!) 17:12, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Results of the 2025 Singaporean general election

[edit]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – LTA disrupting multiple AFDs. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 17:19, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

Adal (historical region)

[edit]

Reason: IP is adding OR content Magherbin (talk) 17:25, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

he lie, look at my actions

Tham Nimal-Raj

[edit]

Temporary move protection: Move protection for the duration of the AfD, please. Moved to draft by creating editor while still at AfD. No indication that this will not happen again. 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 18:00, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

MongoDB

[edit]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Persistent vandalism related to Genghis Khan by accounts who are either sockpuppets or impersonators of long-term abuse accounts like Supreme Genghis Khan or BMX on wheels. Protection should be on this page as long as the related long-term abuse cases are still ongoing. RaschenTechner (talk) 18:29, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

Ivan Crnojević

[edit]

Reason: High level of ip vandalism already warned by myself and other editor on their tp [[1]] Theonewithreason (talk) 19:17, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

Current requests for reduction in protection level

[edit]
Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level
Shortcuts

Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

  • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
  • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
  • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
  • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.

Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Shortcuts

Current requests for edits to a protected page

[edit]
Request a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Shortcut

Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

  • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
  • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
  • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
  • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
  • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Further information: Wikipedia:Edit requests


Handled requests

[edit]

A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.

Protected edit requests

3 protected edit requests
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Wikipedia:Contact us (request) 2025-04-29 01:25 Fully protected (log) Modified by Cyberpower678 on 2017-03-12: "Remove cascading protection per request"
Template:Anontools (request) 2025-05-01 12:08 Cascade-protected from Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items/content (log) From Wikipedia/Protected templates: Protected by Rich Farmbrough on 2009-10-14: "Purpose of page - belt and braces."
User:CanadaGirl (request) 2025-05-02 16:43 Fully protected (log) Protected by DragonflySixtyseven on 2009-01-28: "this user has died; there is no reason to edit her userpage any more"
Updated as needed. Last updated: 16:44, 2 May 2025 (UTC)
9 template-protected edit requests
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Template:Infobox officeholder (request) 2025-02-03 08:29 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mark Arsten on 2013-10-18: "Allowing Protected Template editors"
Template:Video game reviews (request) 2025-03-28 10:58 Template-protected (log) Modified by WOSlinker on 2013-10-19: "allow template editors to modify"
Template:Copied (request) 2025-04-02 02:34 Template-protected (log) Modified by Callanecc on 2015-02-17: "Highly visible template: More than 7500 transclusions"
Template:Merged-from (request) 2025-04-02 03:42 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
Module:Copied (request) 2025-04-02 03:43 Template-protected (log) Protected by Newslinger on 2020-06-14: "Highly visible template"
Template:Rail-interchange (request) 2025-04-02 23:47 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
Wikipedia:WikiProject/Popular pages config.json (request) 2025-04-27 22:56 Template-protected (log) Protected by Izno on 2024-09-28: "protect at TE level"
Template:IPA pulmonic consonants/table (request) 2025-05-01 20:01 Template-protected (log) Protected by Ivanvector on 2020-02-13: "Highly visible template"
Template:Taxonomy/Eukaryota/displayed (request) 2025-05-02 18:42 Template-protected (log) Protected by MusikBot II on 2020-10-19: "High-risk template or module (more info)"
Updated as needed. Last updated: 18:46, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

WP:PERM

Requests for autopatrolled

Autopatrolled

[edit]
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:CherryPie94

[edit]

New page reviewer who has made over 90 articles including 1 good article and quite familiar with content guidelines, I may also as well not clutter the backlog for other reviewers. CherryPie94 🍒🥧 (talk) 06:06, 7 April 2025 (UTC)

One thing that immediately jumped out at me is some biographical articles created (e.g. Kim Na and Son Se-bin) have unsourced biographical information, such as the date of birth. This information should be sourced to ensure compliance with WP:DOB. - Aoidh (talk) 03:07, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
I've considered adding references directly next to DOB, which I did at my two most recent BLPs: Mike Kim and Lee Joon-ho. If birth information is not 100% verifiable, I play it safe (eg. Lee Seung-yoon). Per WP:DOB, links to websites maintained by the subject are generally permitted so I included Kim Na's personal website which states birth year as 1986 in the external links section. I created Son Se-bin over 5 years ago when I was much less experienced, so I don't quite recall which exact source I used for DOB (birth year seems to have been present in Star Today), so I've just amended that. CherryPie94 🍒🥧 (talk) 04:22, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Ah I've misinterpreted that personal website policy, though it does fall under WP:ABOUTSELF, I've now also directly sourced it. CherryPie94 🍒🥧 (talk) 04:39, 12 April 2025 (UTC)

User:Kjansen86

[edit]

I am autopatrolled and an NPP reviewer; I would actually like to nominate User:Kjansen86 to be autopatrolled. I just reviewed and cheerfully accepted almost a dozen perfectly-formulated articles on Zoroastrian texts, and they have made more than 25 overall. Looking at their talk page, this appears to be an experienced and effective editor. Checking their AfD stats, I find one (successful) AfD that they initiated, indicating an awareness of notability. We may as well take them out of the NPP backlog. (This is my first time nominating someone else so if I did it wrong, please let me know!) ~ L 🌸 (talk) 21:17, 16 April 2025 (UTC)

Already done (automated response): This user already has the "autoreviewer" user right. — MusikBot talk 21:20, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
@LEvalyn: I went ahead and adjusted the nomination so it reflects who's actually being discussed, hope you don't mind! For future reference, you can use the "add request" link at the top of this page and replace the {{subst:REVISIONUSER}} with whichever user you're nominating. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 21:42, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Thank you, I really appreciate your fix for this nomination and your tip for next time! ~ L 🌸 (talk) 23:01, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
@LEvalyn: Thank you very much for the positive evaluation of my work on Wikipedia. I really appreciate it. Kjansen86 (talk) 08:22, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

User:-Verso-

[edit]

78 live articles, (64 of which is start class, 5 Cs, 8 Stubs). Only one was deleted which is from 2018. All of the articles are well-sourced. I think this user is good enough for Autopatrolled Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 04:14, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

User:Hteiktinhein

[edit]

Hello, I have created over 30 articles, none of which have been deleted. I am well-versed in Wikipedia's notability guidelines and currently assist new Burmese editors. I focus on creating articles related to Myanmar that need to be written, including those covering current events. Granting me autopatrolled rights would help reduce the backlog of articles awaiting review. Feel free to ping me if you have any questions. Thank you for your consideration. Hteiktinhein (talk) 14:43, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

User:Fade258

[edit]

Hello Admin! I have been regularly creating articles and I'm also familiar with WP:AUTOPAT and Wikipedia policies. Thank you! Fade258 (talk) 15:05, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

User:MerlinVtwelve

[edit]

Hallo! I've created 46 articles, and have been editing Wikipedia since 2010. How time flies! merlinVtwelve (talk) 20:52, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

User:Phantomdj

[edit]

Hi, I have created 118 pages and would like to have autopatrol rights, please. Thanks. Phantomdj (talk) 01:46, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

User:Owais Al Qarni

[edit]
I have been actively contributing to Wikipedia for the past five years and have created over 150 articles. I strive to produce well-sourced, high-quality content on topics such as Bayan al-Quran, Mamunul Haque, and Deobandi fiqh, and I have also improved existing articles like the one on Zakariyya Kandhlawi. While I understand that the Autopatrolled user right is not necessary for editing, I have noticed that the page review process can be significantly delayed, with some of my pages taking 6–12 months to be reviewed. As a New Page Reviewer for the past two years, I actively participate in wiki forums, including AfD, and none of my articles have been deleted in the past three years, which I believe demonstrates my understanding of notability and other relevant guidelines. I believe I am eligible for the Autopatrolled right, which would help reduce the backlog of unreviewed pages. Additionally, I have held the Autopatrolled right on Bengali Wikipedia for the past five years. Thanks. –𝐎𝐰𝐚𝐢𝐬 𝐀𝐥 𝐐𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐢 ʕʘ̅͜ʘ̅ʔ 04:02, 29 April 2025 (UTC)
Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access

AutoWikiBrowser

[edit]
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
There are no outstanding requests for the confirmed flag.

Confirmed

[edit]
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
Requests for extended confirmation

Extended confirmed

[edit]
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Tashmetu

[edit]

I had my EC revoked last year by the arbitration committee. I have since completed the required 500 substantial edits to the best of my knowledge. I applied about a month ago and was refused because I didn't clearly understand the requirements. But hopefully this time I got it correctly. Tashmetu (talk) 13:58, 3 March 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for extended confirmed declined in the past 90 days ([2]) and has had this permission revoked in the past 180 days ([3]). — MusikBot talk 14:00, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
@Xaosflux hey, sorry for tagging you. I just noticed you are the only active admin on this thread and I was wondering if you can look into my request or let me know who I can contact to have it looked at. Tashmetu (talk) 17:36, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Tashmetu, the ArbCom remedy requires that Tashmetu shows that they have made 500 substantive edits; all I can see is a statement that you did. While I think it doesn't mean you have to provide a list of all the contributions (that would be hard to review and pointlessly redundant to the full list), I personally think you should explain at least in some detail how you improved the encyclopedia since the revocation. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 15:57, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Fair point, I assumed there would be some process for this but I will do my best to explian. So I have worked mostly on the history side of Wikipedia, contributing to the "years in France" series and "years in Iraq " series, writing articles, adding details, events, and references. I have a huge library of history books so I thought that's the best use of my resources. I also try to create and enrich pages of notable Iraqi figures, though not as often because it's harder to find reliable sources for these. One of the issues I ran into while editing Iraqi history pages, because they are more recent, is the continuous topics keep coming up, like it's hard to talk about Iraq in the 90s without mentioning Kurdistan! This one of the reasons I would appreciate having my confirmation reinstated. Tashmetu (talk) 16:20, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

User:IdanST

[edit]

I had my ECP revoked 5 months ago. Since then, I've made hundreds of meaningful edits and currently have 806 edits. IdanST (talk) 18:16, 7 March 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had this permission revoked in the past 180 days ([4]). — MusikBot talk 18:22, 7 March 2025 (UTC)
Hello IdanST, please describe the meaningful edits and what you'd like to use the permission for. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 16:01, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Hey, some of the edits I've made were focused on tidying up articles, such as List of snipers (you can check the history). These edits involved a major overhaul: adding sources, removing false or unsourced information, and fixing sentence structures. I've also made substantial edits to other articles, such as Embraer C-390 Millennium (you can check the history), Tilhas Tizi Gesheften, Oradour-sur-Glane massacre, Ayi Silva Kangani, alongside dozens of other articles where I've made meaningful, though not as extensive, contributions.
You should be aware that most of these edits are the result of my work translating articles to the HE Wikipedia, as you can see here. Since my ECP was revoked, I’ve translated over a hundred articles. While reading the English articles before translating them into Hebrew, I also fix any mistakes or make improvements wherever I see the need. IdanST (talk) 18:15, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

User:Jlktutu

[edit]

I had my EC revoked because of gaming of the system. I believe this happened March 22, 2025. Since then, I have attempted to edit constructively on Wikipedia. I want to see if there is a way that I can get EC. Thanks again

 Automated comment This user has had this permission revoked in the past 180 days ([5]). — MusikBot talk 05:50, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
Hello Jlktutu, please describe how you have constructively edited since the revocation and what you'd like to use the permission for. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 16:00, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
I believe that I have made over 1000 edits. However, I do want to put the edits in context. The vast majority of them have been Anti-Vandal. Have also made some other edits, such as one to the Article on Bitcoin. I do want to see if I can contribute to Articles that are EC protected. Especially when there’s something in the news that means the Article ought to be edited. For example, and I am not mentioning this for any special reason, Article on Jerusalem. I would have gotten EC if there was no gaming of the system. I have, however, attempted to become better. Hope I made sense and answered your questions. Thanks again. Jlktutu (talk) 04:11, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
The Jerusalem article seems like an odd choice given that it is the most contested city on the planet and probably in the top 10 most controversial and difficult articles to edit out of the ~7 million English articles. Are you planning to change something there that won't be immediately reverted by one of the 1000+ page watchers? Sean.hoyland (talk) 12:59, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
No, I am not. In fact, it has nothing to do with that Article specifically. I was only using it as an example. I plan on making edits that will not have a need to be reverted Jlktutu (talk) 19:14, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
 Not done; user is now blocked. stwalkerster (talk) 20:43, 29 April 2025 (UTC)
There are no outstanding requests for the event coordinator flag.

Event coordinator

[edit]
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Icem4k

[edit]

We will be hosting a workshop and I would like to create a good number of Accounts with being an IP block. Icem4k (talk) 14:26, 29 April 2025 (UTC)

Who is we? Can you provide more details of where and when this workshop will be held? —Ganesha811 (talk) 20:32, 1 May 2025 (UTC)
There are no outstanding requests for the file mover flag.

File mover

[edit]
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
Requests for mass message sender

Mass message sender

[edit]
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:FarmerUpbeat

[edit]
I believe that I should have Mass Message Sender permissions as I am WP:X’s newsletter (Ichthus)’s chief editor, and I will be sending various newsletters to the people of WP:X, as I have already done. Having this permission will help me fulfill my duties. Thank you! Benedictions, FarmerUpbeat (talk) 11:50, 2 May 2025 (UTC)
Requests for new page reviewer

New page reviewer

[edit]
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Rahmatula786

[edit]

I am reapplying for the new page reviewer role after my initial request was declined because now I realize I had applied prematurely. Since then, I have gained some experience, refined my understanding of Wikipedia’s policies, and have been actively contributing to the Articles for Creation (AfC) review process. This has not only strengthened my ability to assess new articles but has also given me useful experience in engaging constructively with editors.

I am well-versed with Wikipedia’s guidelines, particularly regarding notability, verifiability, and neutrality. My strength is my ability to remain unbiased while reviewing, and I always strive to improve by learning from my mistakes. Though my registered account is only a few months old, I have been editing Wikipedia for a long time, which has given me substantial familiarity with its norms and regulations.

I have been enjoying reviewing AfC drafts, and this experience has encouraged me to take on a more active role in maintaining Wikipedia’s quality. I now feel myself confident that I can handle this responsibility and would greatly appreciate the opportunity to contribute as a new page reviewer.

Thank you for your time and consideration. Best regards, Rahmatula786 (talk) 17:12, 21 February 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for new page reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([6]). — MusikBot talk 17:20, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
@Rahmatula786: What do you mean by though my registered account is only a few months old, I have been editing Wikipedia for a long time – did you have another account before this one? – Joe (talk) 08:42, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
No Sir, Before creating this account, I used to edit Wikipedia anonymously and made various contributions. However, after realizing the benefits of having a registered account, I created this one and have since been actively editing and contributing regularly. Rahmatula786 (talk) 09:33, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
(Non-administrator comment) Why did you reject this submission?[7] topic is notable.. it's seems you don't have knowledge about notability guidelines. Hellorld4 (talk) 01:10, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
I have replied on your talk page. Rahmatula786 (talk) 04:09, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
Apologies for the long wait in seeing aa response to this request.  Done for 1 month as a trial run, after which you may reapply. signed, Rosguill talk 17:18, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

User:JustARandomEditor123

[edit]

I wish to apply for New Page Reviewer permissions to deal with the large backlog of unreviewed pages. I have participated in many AfD discussions, which proves my understanding of Wikipedia's content policies and notability guidelines. JustARandomEditor123 (talk) 10:48, 15 March 2025 (UTC)

@JustARandomEditor123, can you comment on Draft:Tarana Quarry railway station and how your understanding your notability has changed since then (ideally ditto for Litophyton columnaris). Sohom (talk) 21:47, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
After the article on Tarana Quarry railway station was moved to the draftspace for not having enough references (only 1 source was present at the time), I learned that articles required multiple reliable, independent sources that go into detail about the topic were required to demonstrate notability, leading to the draft now having 6 references to meet WP:GNG. As for the Litophyton columnaris article, I learned that articles that have been created in another language version of Wikipedia should only be translated if they meet the notability requirements of English Wikipedia, and should not be translated through machine-generated means such as Google Translate. JustARandomEditor123 (talk) 09:00, 27 April 2025 (UTC)
 Done for 1 month as a trial run, after which you may reapply. signed, Rosguill talk 17:24, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

User:CSMention269

[edit]

I am an AFC reviewer asking for another trial or permanent permission for this flag. Last time, it was granted by @Sohom Datta: for a 2-month trial after the first month trial was successful. ☮️Counter-Strike:Mention 269🕉️(🗨️ ● ✉️ ● 📔) 04:37, 31 March 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Sohom Datta (expires 00:00, 6 April 2025 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 04:40, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
I'd like somebody that is not me to take a look at this request. Sohom (talk) 22:39, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Looks good to me,  Done signed, Rosguill talk 17:34, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

User:Moritoriko

[edit]

Hello, I have 1 denied applied about a month ago because I didn't have 500 undeleted Main space edits at the time. I now have 501 so I am reapplying for temporary permissions. I have a decent amount of experience going through AfDs and source searching to check if they are notability. Moritoriko (talk) 06:40, 7 April 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for new page reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([8]). — MusikBot talk 06:40, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
 Done for 1 month as a trial run, after which you may reapply signed, Rosguill talk 17:37, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

User:Afonso Dimas Martins

[edit]

I believe I meet most criteria. Plus I already review scientific articles irl, so I would say I have some experience on reviewing in general. Here to help where needed. Afonso Dimas Martins (talk) 16:31, 15 April 2025 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) @Afonso Dimas Martins: It appears that you don't have any AFD votes. I suggest try to engage yourself with WP:AFD. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 15:40, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
I am not as much interested in deletion, rather on creation. This was a request to become a reviewer of new articles after all, not a judge of articles that need to be deleted. Afonso Dimas Martins (talk) 15:42, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
@Afonso Dimas Martins: NPP is about reviewing if article is good enough (i.e. notable enough) for wikipedia. AFD votes are proof that you are aware and know what is or is not for Wikipedia. Plus, knowing AFD is part of the criterion for granting Have a good knowledge of content policies and guidelines and an understanding of quality control processes. This is typically demonstrated by prior participation in one or a combination of the following areas: The deletion processes, i.e. AfD, PROD, and CSD. This is base on my own experience as a once got decline due to lacking AFD votes. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 07:55, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
@Afonso Dimas Martins If this helps, Wikipedia has its own arcane set of standards for what topics can be included -- it doesn't always even matter what text is in the article, just whether reliable sources exist talking about it (see the general notability guideline). Essentially, there is a requirement that you have experience arguing about whether articles meet the criteria before you are able to mark new pages as reviewed, which means among other things you think they meet the criteria. Mrfoogles (talk) 00:55, 27 April 2025 (UTC)
Thank you both @Miminity and @Mrfoogles for your response. It wasn't clear for me this should be a criteria for reviewers, but it makes sense. I will keep an eye on the AfD backlog and see where I can contribute. Afonso Dimas Martins (talk) 16:55, 27 April 2025 (UTC)

User:Ambrosiawater

[edit]

Hello, I was given the New Page Reviewer rights as a one-month trial. This permission will expire on 20 April 2025. During this time, I have been doing active reviewing of new pages and learning more about notability, reliable sources, and the CSD/PROD/AfD process. I tried always to be careful and make constructive reviews. I really want to keep helping with this work. So I would like to ask if possible to renew or give the reviewer rights permanently, depending on my work this last month. Thanks a lot for your time and consideration. Ambrosiawater (talk) 09:56, 16 April 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Rosguill (expires 00:00, 20 April 2025 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 10:00, 16 April 2025 (UTC)

User:Mateus2019

[edit]

I have created 158 articles and lists (+ some categories) within a 15+ year time span and would like to have a one to three month try-out to help with the backlog starting this May. I would work in the areas of human geography, transport and visual arts. Most people know my be User:Scriberius (cannot log-in anymore because I've lost the password). Thanks, --Mateus2019 (talk) 07:00, 27 April 2025 (UTC)

User:HilssaMansen19

[edit]

I would like to request temporary rights to contribute to Wikipedia by reviewing new pages as there is a huge backlog. I have been working on Wikipedia for past few months as an active user. During this time period, I have learnt a lot of things and learning something new every time I work here. Before these 2 months, I had a little experience on creating pages and within this time period, I started contributing by expanding older or creating new articles mostly within similar topic base. I would be glad to contribute to Wikipedia by reviewing new pages and also, learn along the way. I will also be working with the editors of new articles which might be notable but lack sources or other requirements. Thus, I am requesting a temporary grant of this right and I will prove for further grant by doing worthy work. HilssaMansen19 (talk) 09:52, 27 April 2025 (UTC)

  • Main reason is, I wish to join the May Backlog drive and contribute there. I have created several articles, including some years back after which I was inactive for long. I participated in AfD patrol before being inactive and recently engaging in a good way as well.
  • A temporary grant is requested through this request.
  • I will prove the granted right worthy enough through great work to retain it for further period as well.

HilssaMansen19 (talk) 10:22, 28 April 2025 (UTC)

I am messaging here again to seek a temporary request for the Backlog drive. I have understanding of Wikipedia policies like notability, verifiability and reliability which are the base of new pages reviewing. I wish to start working instantly now in the May Backlog drive. Thanks. HilssaMansen19 (talk) 18:13, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

User:ClaudineChionh

[edit]

I had been planning to request AfC permission but the May backlog drive prompted me to request NPP instead. I am a long-term gnome, vandal-fighter, rollbacker, and occasional Teahouse helper. Since returning from my last wikibreak I have familiarised myself with current policies and contentious topics and am developing a nose for LLM and copyvio content. ClaudineChionh (she/her · talk · email · global) 14:44, 27 April 2025 (UTC)

 Done for 3 months. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:34, 30 April 2025 (UTC)

User:Smartypants327

[edit]

I would like to have this flag because I like proofreading and making sure articles are factual and concise. I am a writer for The Griffins' Nest as well. Smartypants327 (talk) 17:53, 27 April 2025 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) @Smartypants327: It seems like you don't have any WP:AFD votes. Try participating in the WP:AFD process first. Participation on AFD is one of the requirements for being an WP:NPR. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 01:24, 28 April 2025 (UTC)

User:Lollipoplollipoplollipop

[edit]

Requesting temporary rights to participate in WP:MAY25. Been an editor for a decade now with some experience in AfD, PRODs, and creating new articles so I hope I'll be able to help out with the drive. //Lollipoplollipoplollipop::talk 19:05, 27 April 2025 (UTC)

 Done for month of May. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:36, 30 April 2025 (UTC)

User:Czarking0

[edit]

Looking to begin participating. I already review AfC and want to engage in the May drive. Czarking0 (talk) 05:58, 28 April 2025 (UTC)

User:LunaEclipse

[edit]

Requesting a renewal as my NPP rights are going to expire in a week. 🌙Eclipse (she/they/all neos • talk • edits) 11:51, 28 April 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Elli (expires 00:00, 12 May 2025 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 12:00, 28 April 2025 (UTC)

User:WormEater13

[edit]

Hi there! I am requesting a NPP trial, particularly for WP:MAY25. I am pretty experienced in CSP, RPP, AfD, and AfC. All the articles that I have created have never been deleted or nominated for AfD either, and i've significantly rewritten quite a few articles. I primarily do recent changes patrol and AfD - but recently, i've been granted AfC reviewer, so i've been doing quite a bit of AfC reviews. I believe that I am extensively knowledgable about Wikipedia's 3 core principles - WP:V, WP:N, and WP:NPOV. I would love to help clean up the NPP backlog with the May 2025 drive! WormEater13 (talk • contribs) 16:44, 28 April 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for new page reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([9]). — MusikBot talk 16:50, 28 April 2025 (UTC)
(non-admin comment) I reviewed WormEater13's AfD contributions during an unrelated discussion and found that their many nominations have been fairly accurate, especially considering they only started participating in AfD this month. Toadspike [Talk] 11:44, 30 April 2025 (UTC)

User:Villkomoses

[edit]

Hello fellow editors! I'd like to apply for NPR rights. For a while now, I've been contributing in various ways—editing and translating articles, participating in AfD-related activities (both nominating and voting), helping with the welcoming committee, etc.—and I would appreciate it if the community granted me the opportunity to participate in NPR. I believe my knowledge and the experience I've gained from participating in AfD discussions make me eligible for this role.Villkomoses (talk) 14:50, 29 April 2025 (UTC) Villkomoses (talk) 14:50, 29 April 2025 (UTC)

User:Hmr

[edit]

I have been on Wikipedia since my teens and would now like to help with patrolling pages through WP:MAY25 and at least the summer. I have considerable experience with Wikipedia content work and the AFD process. Hmr (talk) 18:06, 29 April 2025 (UTC)

 Done for 3 months Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:30, 30 April 2025 (UTC)

User:TzarN64

[edit]

Hello, i'm TzarN64! I've been editing articles for awhile and have contributed to good articles in the past. I've noticed that there has been a large influx of unreviewed new pages, and i want to help. I believe i have a good knowledge on AfD's, notablity, and verifiblity, as seen in my previous works on AfD pages. Thank you. TzarN64 (talk) 14:48, 30 April 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has 374 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot talk 14:50, 30 April 2025 (UTC)

User:Pmsyyz

[edit]

I saw the request for new page reviewers at the top of my watchlist. Reviewed one (NGC 2223), looked for how to mark it as reviewed, and found out I need to have this permission. Thanks. -- Pmsyyz (talk) 19:11, 30 April 2025 (UTC)

User:Xrimonciam

[edit]
Hello. I'm applying for New Page Reviewer rights to help with reviewing the large number of new articles. I’ve learned a lot and developed a solid understanding of Wikipedia policies such as Notability (WP:N/GNG/NCORP, ANYBIO), Verifiability (WP:V), and Neutral Point of View (WP:NPOV). My involvement in Articles for Deletion discussions and reviewing at Articles for Creation has given me additional practical experience, and I apply the mentioned guidelines during content verification, evaluation, or trimming unsourced material, and so on. Xrimonciam (talk) 08:05, 1 May 2025 (UTC)
Requests for pending changes reviewer

Pending changes reviewer

[edit]
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Somajyoti

[edit]

I am requesting permission to be a Pending Changes Reviewer. I spend most of my day editing Wikipedia. I have gone through almost all the pages under Category:Wikipedia policies, including Wikipedia's policies on vandalism detection, BLP policy, NPOV, Verifiability, and copyright. I have read the Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes guideline. Please consider my request. Somajyoti ✉ 07:26, 12 April 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had an account for 25 days. — MusikBot talk 07:30, 12 April 2025 (UTC)

User:Loserhead

[edit]

Hello. I would like to request pending changes reviewer rights. I pass the WP:PCCRITERIA as far as I know, and the right would allow me to help even more to build the encyclopedia by making sure only acceptable edits are approved. Thank you for your consideration. loserhead (talk) 16:26, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

User:AlvaKedak

[edit]

I am eager to work enthusiastically to help reduce the backlog of pending changes by reviewing and maintaining edits. I have read and understood WP:VAND, and I will issue procedural warnings and welcome new users who edit articles under PCR protection. AɭʋaKʰedək (talk) 21:02, 28 April 2025 (UTC)

User:Willbill6272

[edit]

to help out and to contibute |possible (talk page stalker) Willbill6272 (talk) 15:34, 30 April 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has 8 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot talk 15:40, 30 April 2025 (UTC)
@Willbill6272 Most of you edits seems to be in your user space, and I don't see a large number of reverts. Do you know what pending changes reviewer is? Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 12:44, 1 May 2025 (UTC)
Requests for rollback

Rollback

[edit]
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Mohammad Umar Ali

[edit]

Hi, I have been on Wikipedia for over a year and have made over 1k edits. I mostly edit and monitor history articles. Several articles are sometimes disrupted knowingly or unknowingly by editors for which I have to revert. Having Rollback right would make the patrolling work easier and help to combat vandalism. I am aware of most of Wikipedia polices (WP:OR,WP:NPOV,WP:RS,etc.) I have also authored few articles like Bajirao I see [10]. Mohammad Umar Ali (talk) 07:21, 28 April 2025 (UTC)

User:AllCatsAreGrey

[edit]

Hello, I am requesting rollback permissions as I would like to utilize tools such as Huggle, which require this permission. I have been actively patrolling recent changes using a custom filter and have consistently notified users whose edits I have reverted. Thanks, – AllCatsAreGrey (talk) 20:00, 29 April 2025 (UTC)

User:Cabrils

[edit]

Hi, I am a recent graduate from the [| Counter Vandalism Academy] and have been conducting counter vandalism using the Recent Edits page, and Twinkle. My tutor at the CVA, Cassiopeia, suggested I apply for rollback permission once I had completed my course, so that I could properly use Huggle for counter vandalism work. I have once previously applied for rollback permission, over 18 months ago, however this was understandably declined because it was premature. Since then, I have undertaken considerably more counter vandalism work (which I typically manage to undertake 2-5 hours per week) and I feel being able to use Huggle would significantly improve efficiency. I would also be happy to only be granted rollback permission on a trial basis, if that is an option. Thank you. Cabrils (talk) 04:42, 30 April 2025 (UTC)

I confirmed Cabrils has taken and pass the CVUA program - see here with the final exam score of 95.5.Ping me if you need further info about Cabrils' work on CVUA. Cassiopeia talk 04:59, 30 April 2025 (UTC)
 Done Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:22, 30 April 2025 (UTC)

User:Mamani1990

[edit]

Hello admins,

I’m respectfully requesting rollback rights so that I may contribute more efficiently to counter-vandalism work using Huggle. Patrolling recent changes is what I enjoy most on Wikipedia, and I’ve found that it’s where I can make the most impact with the time I have available. I've made 1840 edits since January. At present, I review edits by right-clicking the diff link to open changes in a new tab in Chrome and then use RedWarn to revert and warn users when appropriate. While this process works, it's time-consuming and not ideal for high-volume patrolling. Having rollback rights would allow me to use Huggle, which would significantly increase my productivity and responsiveness in handling vandalism. Earlier, I made two requests for different user rights but withdrew them after realizing that my interest lies more in patrolling and counter-vandalism than in article creation or extended content curation. That said, I have written one article and contributed to creating another recently, and I do plan to continue helping in content areas where I can. I also take direction well and am open to feedback. Thank you for considering my request. m a MANÍ1990(talk | contribs) 21:48, 30 April 2025 (UTC)
There are no outstanding requests for template editor.

Template editor

[edit]
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

    I am at about 70,000 edits aross all Wiki projects.

    I, Solipsist, hereby award you this Barnstar of Diligence for you extraordinary patience, over many years, in handling perennial Corn vs. Maize debates.
    The Minor Barnstar
    Minor edits make a major difference. —Gaff ταλκ 04:03, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
    The Minor Barnstar
    Ahh, a sigh of relief from IvoShandor to Rmhermen, thanks for your work on articles related to the Black Hawk War. IvoShandor 05:31, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
    The Original Barnstar, for good deed #1 The Original Barnstar
    This barnstar is for that quick and poisonous work you did on the Ayina River. Yours sincerely, GeorgeLouis (talk) 19:52, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

    Templates I use often but never remember

    [edit]
    • {{NorthAmNative}} {{WikiProject Michigan}} {{WikiProject Protected areas}} {{river}}
    • (Wikipedia:Template_messages/Image_namespace)
    • {{fact}}{{no license}} {{no source}} {{or-fu-re|Image:replacementimage}} {{Orphaned fairuse not replaced or {{or-fu-nr}} *{{PD-USGov-Interior-NPS}} {{subst:deletedpage}} {{globalize/USA}}{{intro-missing}}
    		 WP:AIV
    		WP:ANI
    		WP:NPP
    		WP:RPP
    		WP:RFR
    		WP:AFD
    		WP:XFD
    		CAT:CSD
    		WP:CSD
    		WP:RM
    		WP:RAA
    		WP:DR
    		WP:TM
    		WP:TT
    		WP:RCU
    		WP:LOP
    		CAT:AB
    		WP:BS
    		WP:RD
    		WP:NFC
    		WP:IUP

    Help box by Jennavecia (talk · contribs)

    "Do you want to take a survey?"

    [edit]

    On Feb. 12, 2005, I did a random pages survey. Out of 100 random pages, only 1 was a U.S. town. That's progress. Three towns in the UK, 1 in Spain and 1 in Portugal also turned up. Overall biographies were the largest category at 22%, followed by geography with 15% total. Then Lists at 7%, Disambiguation pages at 6%.

    On Feb. 24, 2006, I repeated the 100 random page survey, this time getting 5 U.S. towns. Overall, geography had 26%, biography 21%, fiction 9%, music 4%, colleges 4%, lists 3% and disambigs 4%. Clearly geography and biography are our largest areas. Music, science and business scored less than I expected. Non-individual History was hardly discernable.

    Even by Feb. 2005, 100 out of almost 500,000 was not statistically significant but was as much as I had patience for.

    Wikiprojects I am a member of:

    [edit]
    Wikipedia:WikiProject Protected areas
    Wikipedia:WikiProject Rivers
    Wikipedia:WikiProject Space missions
    Wikipedia:WikiProject Michigan

    Short To Do list

    [edit]

    Early Anon work, no need to bug the developers

    [edit]

    Up to Dec 16, 2003, all the edits at these anonymous id's were mine (59 edits):

    More recently 1,250 or so edits on 75.41.110.200 are apparently all mine. Apparently my new ID is 75.41.109.190. There are undoubtedly many others as the earliest history of many articles was not preserved by the software.

    List of most of my original pictures and some maps

    [edit]

    For copyright declaration purposes The following photographs and diagrams on Wikipedia were taken by and uploaded by me and released under GNU-FDL:

    • Update March 21, 2006 by searching with Interiot's Tool (no longer updated - [11] does edit counts though)

    Pictures

    [edit]

    Maps

    [edit]

    Numerous locator maps for U.S. national parks like Image:LocMap Big Bend National Park.png and Image:LocMap Tongariro National Park.png - most now replaced by dynamic map system

    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Rmhermen&oldid=1189715043"